Monday 23 November 2020

What I've Been Reading, October 2020

Links

Above the Fold

  • Howard Zinn: Don’t Despair about the Supreme Court, by Howard Zinn, The Progressive
    "It would be naive to depend on the Supreme Court to defend the rights of poor people, women, people of color, dissenters of all kinds. Those rights only come alive when citizens organize, protest, demonstrate, strike, boycott, rebel, and violate the law in order to uphold justice."
  • The Tragedy of the ‘Tragedy of the Commons’, by Matto Mildenberger, Pocket— Scientific American
    "The man who wrote one of environmentalism’s most-cited essays was a racist, eugenicist, nativist and Islamaphobe—plus his argument was wrong."
  • A response to Pollin and Chomsky: We need a Green New Deal without growth, by Jason Hickel, on Jason's blog
    Good stuff, but one needs to be aware of EROEI and the surplus energy problem to really have an intelligent discussion of Green New Deals. And to be aware that as we speak the planet's carrying capacity is decreasing, and so the sustainability target we are aiming for is continually moving.
  • Not a Coup but a Cover-Up and a Con Game, by Jeet Heer, The Nation
    "Trump is refusing to concede and purging the civilian leadership of the Pentagon. The moment requires vigilance rather than panic."
  • 'Sustainability is wishful thinking': get ready for the energy downshift, by John McCrone, Stuff—Environment
    "Renewables can’t deliver in this way so energy abundance is about to become energy poverty. And we need to get ready."
    "Focus on eliminating the need for energy rather than on worrying how to keep increasing its supply."
  • San Francisco just banned gas in all new buildings. Could it ever happen in Australia?, by Susan M Park and Madeline Taylor, The Conversation
    Perhaps all those who are eagerly awaiting their gas hook ups here in Kincardine should ask if this could every happen in Ontario.
  • Degrowth: A response to Branko Milanovic, by Jason Hickel, on his blog
    This is a must read, even if it is ridiculously optimistic about the likelihood of such policies ever being implemented. It is important to know what we are going to say no too, as we rush on toward collapse. And do follow the links, which lead to a bunch of good articles.

Miscellaneous

Things end up in this section not because they aren't important, but because I can't figure out what other section they should go in.

Suddenly, "liberal" is a dirty word

And with good reason, it seems.

  • David Graeber on the Extreme 'Centre', by David Graeber, YouTube—Double Down News
    “It strikes me that what’s called the moderates are the most immoderate people possible”
    "Previously unreleased video of David Graeber talking about liberalism. Originally filmed at the start of 2020. We planned to make a dedicated film on the subject with David upon his return to London. We release this video with the blessing of his beloved wife Nika.
    Rest in Power David Graeber"

Coronavirus

Capitalism, Communism, Anarchy

  • The radical aristocrat who put kindness on a scientific footing, by Lydia Syson, Aeon—Psyche
  • Economics for the people—the challenge of reclaiming the commons from capitalism, by Dirk Philipsen, Aeon
    "Against the capitalist creeds of scarcity and self-interest, a plan for humanity’s shared flourishing is finally coming into view"
    We should be concerned about the "tragedy of the private", not the "tragedy of the commons".
    While this article recognizes the role of fossil fuels in driving growth of the private, it also makes a statement like, "We produce and grow enough for every child, woman and man to have a good and dignified life wherever they live". True, but we must consider the cost to the planet of producing and growing that much, and ask ourselves how long it can be sustained. (Not long, in case anyone is wondering.)
    Scarcity is real, capitalism only makes it worse, even as we produce more and more while ignoring the consequences
    Ordinary people these days have tastes borrowed from billionaires (comfort, convenience, entertainment) and no idea of frugality, so when you say "we produce enough", and talk about prosperity for all, it is taken as something entirely different from what this article means.
  • Are You An Anarchist?, by David Graeber, YouTube
  • David Graeber on basic income, by David Graber, YouTube
    "David Graeber speaking at 'Basic Income: How do we get there?' Basic Income UK meet-up at St Clements Church Kings Square, London, 3 December 2015."
  • David Graeber on a Fair Future Economy, by David Graeber, YouTube
    David Graeber was an anthropologist, a leading figure in the Occupy movement, and one of our most original and influential public thinkers.
  • The Future Is Worker-Owned, by Douglas Rushkoff, Medium—Team Human
    "It’s time for businesses to work for people, not the other way around."

The New Fascism, and Antifa

I hear a lot of well educated people saying that the people some of us are calling fascists don't meet all the criteria for being "real" fascists. Others have even accused us of calling anyone we disagree with a fascist. I predict that a few decades (maybe just a few years) from now those same people will be saying they wish they hadn't been quite so fussy with their definitions, and had acted sooner to oppose these "new fascists", even if they weren't identical to the fascists of the twentieth century.

Resource Depletion, formerly (and still including) Peak Oil

The change in title stems from the fact that it's not just oil that is peaking.

  • The fall of an empire, by Felix Salmon, Axios
    "The decline of ExxonMobil has been remarkable in its magnitude and unexpectedness."
  • Shell To Shut Down Louisiana Refinery, by Irina Slav, OilPrice.com
    "Royal Dutch Shell will shut down its Convent refinery in Louisiana after failing to find a buyer for the facility, Bloomberg reports, citing a statement by the company."

Climate Change

  • Russian Arctic Sea Fails to Freeze , The Moscow Times
    "Russia’s Arctic Laptev Sea has not yet frozen for the first time since records began, according to the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Centre."

Gardening

Genetic Engineering

Before jumping to the erroneous conclusion that this section was paid for by Monsanto, stop for a moment and understand that organic agriculture/food is a multi-billion dollar per year industry that relies on fear to get people to buy its product. Millions of dollars are spent to convince you that non-organic food is dangerous. In fact both conventionally grown and organic foods are equally safe. Sadly neither method of agriculture is even remotely substainable.

  • Panic-free GMOs, A Grist Special Series by Nathanael Johnson
    "It’s easy to get information about genetically modified food. There are the dubious anti-GM horror stories that recirculate through social networks. On the other side, there’s the dismissive sighing, eye-rolling, and hand patting of pro-GM partisans. But if you just want a level-headed assessment of the evidence in plain English, that’s in pretty short supply. Fortunately, you’ve found the trove."
    A series of articles that does a pretty good job of presenting the facts about GMOs. I plan to include one article from this series here each month.
  • Food for bots: Distinguishing the novel from the knee-jerk in the GMO debate, by Nathanael Johnson, GRist— Panic-free GMOs

Practical Skills

  • Make a mid-century modern-style coffee table, by Patrick Laperrière and Matt Wallace, YouTube— Lee Valley
    "Lee Valley’s Patrick Laperrière and Matt Wallace show you how to make a mid-century modern-style coffee table out of black walnut."
    I watched this video because I am at the moment seriously considering making a coffee table. It presents some good ideas.
  • Using a Blanket Pin, by Coalcracker Bushcraft, YouTube

Canadian Politics

Politics

Linguistics

Debunking Resources

These are of such importance that I've decide to leave them here on an ongoing basis.

Science

Lacking an Owner's Manual

The human body/mind/spirit doesn't come with an owner's manual, and we continually struggle to figure out how best to operate them.

Gender and Sexuality

There is No God, and Thou Shall Have No Other Gods

I don't think I've made any secret of the fact that I am an atheist, but I may not have made it clear that I think any sort of worship is a bad thing and that believing in things is to be avoided whenever possible. Indeed, I do not believe in belief itself. That's what the "Thou shall have no other gods" is about—it's not enough to quit believing in whatever God or Gods you were raised to believe in, but also we must avoid other gods, including material wealth, power and fame.

Further, many people today (including most atheists) follow the religion of "progress", which is based on the belief that mankind is destined to follow a road that leads from the caves ever upward to the stars, and that however bad things seem today, they are bound to be better tomorrow due to technological advancement and economic growth. This is very convenient for those who benefit most from economic growth, but it is hardly based on any sort of science and leads to a great deal of confused thinking.

Humour

These are great times for political satire.

Books

Fiction

Non-Fiction

  • Natural: How Faith in Nature's Goodness Leads to Harmful Fads, Unjust Laws, and Flawed Science, by Alan Levinovitz
    Overall, this book does a pretty good job of highlighting much of the nonsense done in the name of nature. If anything, he is a little too kind to the "natural" nuts, especially in the section on medicine. Personally, I just haven't found the medical profession to be as uncaring and inhuman as Leviowitz would have us believe. But then I don't live in the U.S.
    Anyway, if the idea that everything natural isn't necessarily good is new to you, this one is definitely worth a read.

6 comments:

Red said...

Hi Irv, I always like your " what I've been reading" section as it gives me some new material to digest. I'd like your opinion on fiat currencies as they are belief systems as well as religions. We have to participate in them for obvious reasons. That aside what are your feelings on ways around them? I hope collapse is treating you well!

Irv Mills said...

@ Red
Sorry I haven't managed to answer sooner.
The "economy", as we use the word today is a belief system and a religion, one that is used to exploit almost everyone except the few who do the exploiting. Fiat currencies are just one aspect of our economic system. Currencies based on precious metals are often touted as a better alternative, but I just don't see it. Just a different kind of fiat. We abandoned the "gold standard" because there are limited amounts of gold available and, at that time, the economy was growing so fast that the amount of gold available was becoming a limiting factor.

But what makes an economy work (and grow is energy, not money. Or more precisely, surplus energy--the energy that is available at the output of whatever process we use to access it.

Money is largely about keeping score, and preforms three functions: it serves as a medium of exchange, a unit of account and a store of value. The third one, storing value, is pretty dubious, since money itself has little or no real value. It amounts to a promise on our future productivity. And for those of us who are expecting collapse to continue and deepen, it seems that such promises may not be fulfilled.

At some point the strain on our economic system will cause it to fail, and at that point it will not be hard to get around. Many would say that the task at that point will be to replace our current financial system with something that can provide the same functions without causing the same problems.

--continued in next comment--

Irv Mills said...

@ Red, continued

I don't agree that we need any sort of system using money. I would question that we need to keep score at all. For most of the last two million years when there have been something you could call people, we have lived in small groups where everyone knows everyone else and we simply did not keep score. People contributed to the group to the extent of their abilities and were provided for the extent that the group could provide for their needs. Those who didn't contribute sufficiently or consumed excessively were shamed into changing their ways, shunned or cast out.

Economists will tell you that before there was money people bartered, but this is largely nonsense. People living in communities didn't barter with each other, only with strangers. And they felt no compunctions about dealing harshly in such situations, and getting the better of people they would likely never see again.


At some point, as communities grew larger, keeping score was seen as a way of coping with some problems that arose, and ways of keeping score were devised, including money, eventually. At that point, of course, they didn't realize the problems that their solutions would cause in the long run.

I am not sure if there is any way around either set of problems.

Personally, when I deal with the "Business As Usual" system, I use money, since the system requires it. When I am dealing with friends, I help out however I can, without expecting to be paid, and accept help when I need it and it is offered. And I don't keep score in any formal sense. Of course, when you are dealing with people on an ongoing basis, it becoming clear if they are taking advantage, and there is nothing much you can do but avoid them.

russell1200 said...

@Irv

Obviously the harvesting of new energy sources (mostly fossil fuels) expanded our economy.

But we really have always worked harder expanding the resource harvesting than at economic usage.

I am skeptical, but we do have the option of going forward to do a massive overhaul of how we go about doing things. I minor version of that would be how Covid finally uncorked the bottle that said we all have to spend 1+ hours everyday in transport to work when we could work at home.

Steven B Kurtz said...

Re The Tragedy of the Commons rant:

Ad Hominem is the first and primary argument. The author should have a look at Philosopher Herschel Elliott's work on this.

See:
https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/27503548

Steven B Kurtz said...


If that link fails, try:

https://dieoff.com/page121.htm