Wednesday, 17 March 2021

What I've Been Reading, February 2021

Links

Above the Fold

Usually I reserve this section for late breaking news. But this month I discovered a whole bunch of YouTube videos featuring David Gaeber, a notable anarchist scholar who passed away this past September. This isn't all of the videos I found, or even the best of them, it's just what I found time to watch.

  • Extinction and rebellion: the late David Graeber, by Peter Batt, YouTube
    "David argues that the political elite is 'useless', and could be easily dislodged by a rebellion with even vague aims."
  • David Graeber - The Bully's Pulpit: On the Elementary Structure of Domination, by David Graeber, YouTube—AudibleAnarchist
    "In this essay, Graeber links the psychological impulses of bullying—both of bullies and of passive observers of bullying—to structures of power inherent within hierarchical authority. He contends that from a young age, we are socialized to side with bullies and against victims, and we are socialized to see victims as either deserving their punishment or of having the same moral worth as the bullies themselves."
  • Where Did Money REALLY Come From? by David Graeber, YouTube—Deficit Owls
    "Professor David Graeber, anthropologist and author of 'Debt: The First 5,000 Years,' discussing the history of money and credit. The economics profession tends to teach that money arose from barter. However, anthropologists have been searching for 200 years and found absolutely no evidence for this. "
  • Graeber and Wengrow on the Myth of the Stupid Savage, by David Graeber and David Wengrow, YouTube
  • Graeber and Wengrow on the Myth of the Stupid Savage, by David Graeber, Jourtnal du Mauss
    "What if the kind of people we like to imagine so simple and innocent because they are free from rulers, governments, bureaucracies and ruling classes, were free not because they lack imagination, but because they are in fact more imaginative than us. We find it hard to imagine what a truly free society would look like; perhaps they do not have as much difficulty imagining what would be an arbitrary power and domination. Maybe they can not only imagine it, but also consciously organize their society in such a way that such things never happen."

Miscellaneous

The Lights Went Out in Texas

Structural Violence

  • Women Aren't Nags—We're Just Fed Up, by GEMMA HARTLEY, Harpers Bazaar
    "Emotional labor is the unpaid job men still don't understand."
    I found this on Facebook, read it, shared it and thought, yep, that's an example of structural violence against women. I was amazed that the men who commented were mainly apologists for the guy in the article. A guy who clearly didn't want to do his share of the relationship building work in his marriage.
  • Structural Violence, Wikipedia
  • Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology, by David Graeber,
    In this book, David Graeber introduced me to this idea of structural violence in relationships between the oppressed and their oppressors. The following quote is to be found on pages 72 and 73 of the book:

"Such a theoretical emphasis opens the way to a theory of the relation of power not with knowledge, but with ignorance and stupidity. Because violence, particularly structural violence, where all the power is on one side, creates ignorance. If you have the power to hit people over the head whenever you want, you don’t have to trouble yourself too much figuring out what they think is going on, and therefore, generally speaking, you don’t. Hence the sure-fire way to simplify social arrangements, to ignore the incredibly complex play of perspectives, passions, insights, desires, and mutual understandings that human life is really made of, is to make a rule and threaten to attack anyone who breaks it. This is why violence has always been the favored recourse of the stupid: it is the one form of stupidity to which it is almost impossible to come up with an intelligent response. It is also of course the basis of the state.

Contrary to popular belief, bureaucracies do not create stupidity. They are ways of managing situations that are already inherently stupid because they are, ultimately, based on the arbitrariness of force.

Ultimately this should lead to a theory of the relation of violence and the imagination. Why is it that the folks on the bottom (the victims of structural violence) are always imagining what it must be like for the folks on top (the beneficiaries of structural violence), but it almost never occurs to the folks on top to wonder what it might be like to be on the bottom? Human beings being the sympathetic creatures that they are this tends to become one of the main bastions of any system of inequality—the downtrodden actually care about their oppressors, at least, far more than their oppressors care about them—but this seems itself to be an effect of structural violence. "

Somewhere else (I haven't been about to find the quote), Graeber explains that a certain amount work is involved in any relationship that doesn't involve oppression, as those involved strive to understand each other. If you hear someone on one side of a relationship talking about how it is impossible to understand the other, it is a sure sign that they are "on top" and don't have to do the work because they can simply tell those on the other side to shut up and do what they are told. Those who are "on the bottom" develop, as a defense mechanism, a highly refined understanding on those who are above them. You see this between men and women, bosses and workers, masters and slaves, and so on.

Coronavirus

  • We Hate You Now—The Hardest Problem of The Aftertimes, by Quinn Norton, Medium—Surviving COVID-19
  • The Differences Between the Vaccines Matter, by Hilda Bastian, The Atlantic
    "Yes, all of the COVID-19 vaccines are very good. No, they’re not all the same."
    "'The idea that people can’t handle nuance,' Jha tweeted at the end of February, 'it’s paternalistic. And untrue.' I couldn’t agree more. The principle of treating people like adults is fundamental. We don’t need to exaggerate. Talking about the trade-offs between different medicines and vaccines is often complicated, but we do it all the time—and we can do it with COVID-19 vaccines too."

Capitalism, Communism, Anarchy

The New Fascism, the Far-Right and Antifa

I hear a lot of well educated people saying that the people some of us are calling fascists don't meet all the criteria for being "real" fascists. Others have even accused us of calling anyone we disagree with a fascist. I predict that a few decades (maybe just a few years) from now those same people will be saying they wish they hadn't been quite so fussy with their definitions, and had acted sooner to oppose these "new fascists", even if they weren't identical to the fascists of the twentieth century.

Collapse

  • Overconsumption, Wikipedia
    "Overconsumption is a situation where resource use has outpaced the sustainable capacity of the ecosystem. A prolonged pattern of overconsumption leads to environmental degradation and the eventual loss of resource bases."
  • Human Overpopulation, Wikipedia
    "Human overpopulation (or particularly human population overshoot) refers to a human population being too large in a way that their society or environment cannot readily sustain them. It can be identified with regional human populations, but is generally discussed as an issue of world population. Overpopulation is caused by human population growth. In recent centuries, human population growth has become exponential, due to the green revolution and other changes in technology that reduce mortality. Experts concerned by overpopulation argue that overpopulation causes overconsumption and subsequently overshoot of natural resources. This leads to exceeding the carrying capacity of a geographical area (or Earth as a whole) and damages to the environment. Human overpopulation is often discussed as part of other population concerns such as demographic push, depopulation, or even ecological or societal collapse and human extinction."

Genetic Engineering

Before jumping to the erroneous conclusion that this section was paid for by Monsanto, stop for a moment and understand that organic agriculture/food is a multi-billion dollar per year industry that relies on fear to get people to buy its product. Millions of dollars are spent to convince you that non-organic food is dangerous. In fact both conventionally grown and organic foods are equally safe. Sadly neither method of agriculture is even remotely substainable.

  • Panic-free GMOs, A Grist Special Series by Nathanael Johnson
    "It’s easy to get information about genetically modified food. There are the dubious anti-GM horror stories that recirculate through social networks. On the other side, there’s the dismissive sighing, eye-rolling, and hand patting of pro-GM partisans. But if you just want a level-headed assessment of the evidence in plain English, that’s in pretty short supply. Fortunately, you’ve found the trove."
    A series of articles that does a pretty good job of presenting the facts about GMOs. I plan to include one article from this series here each month.
  • Golden apple or forbidden fruit? Following the money on GMOs, by Nathanael Johnson, Grist

Dancing on Graves

  • Rush Limbaugh Made America Worse, by Alex Shephard, The New Republic
    "The racist, sexist radio host played a pivotal role in injecting cruelty and conspiracy into conservative mass media."
    "He thrived on making people angrier and more alienated, on obscuring the truth, and rewarding meanness at every turn."

Debunking Resources

These are of such importance that I've decide to leave them here on an ongoing basis.

Science

Lacking an Owner's Manual

The human body"/mind/spirit doesn't come with an owner's manual, and we continually struggle to figure out how best to operate them.

  • Is the Western way of raising kids weird? by Kelly Oake, BBC—Weird West | Parenting
    From sleeping in separate beds to their children to transporting them in prams, Western parents have some unusual ideas about how to raise them.
    The key to thinking outside the Western box might be to remember that babies are not out to manipulate us, no matter how tempting it might be to see it that way at 3am. "What we really need with babies is to stop thinking about them as hard-to-please bosses," says Dutta. "They're helpless little beings that have come into this world, and we must look at them with empathy and compassion."
  • 15 Mini Things That Can Instantly Make You Less Likable, by John Roe, medium—Mind Cafe
  • Refugees and Migration

    Poverty, Homeless People, Minimum Wage, UBI, Health Care, Affordable Housing

    Education

    Humour

    Books

    Fiction

    I finally finished the Emberverse series this month, a total of 15 novels.

    Non-Fiction

    Still reading A People's History of the United States. Still highly recommended.

    4 comments:

    Don Hayward said...

    The article on baby rearing raises some issues the reporter ignored, perhaps because they viewed the subject from their own class background.
    The topic begs for a vertical study of the development of "western" practices. This requires deep research over thousands of years.
    A second noticeable area of interest is the foundation of the "culture" that is often referenced in the piece. How these practices might have been different in different classes of feudal societies and then through feudal-capitalist societies are two of probably many factors of interest.
    There needs to be a much richer body of work on this subject.
    Thanks for the Graber links.

    Irv Mills said...

    @ Don

    That article caught my eye because we didn't follow "Western practices" when raising our kids, and it seemed to work out pretty well.

    I've done a bit of reading on the subject, and it seems that those "Western practices" only came into being in the last few hundred years, which I think says a fair bit about the industrial age.

    Bev Courtney said...

    I usually flip through the headlines before I choose what to read and so I went straight to the article about jigsaw puzzles, because I've always loved doing them. I've got boxes of them stored in the cupboards somewhere, but the ones I do now are all on the computer. Years ago I bought an excellent puzzle program from the US for only $30 or so and it's a beauty. You can make any picture into a puzzle....favourite photos or free ones downloaded from the internet. The pieces can be picked up and moved around, individually or in groups, with the mouse cursor and there's a facility to 'show all the edge pieces' first (cheating a bit, but when you imagine, say, 800 pieces, on a laptop screen it makes starting off easy). There are 6 boxes on the sidelines to store various pieces and they can be opened and closed as needed. Pressing the space bar enables the whole image to be displayed when wanted. There are sounds that can be enabled and when 2 pieces successfully join up, there's a satisfying 'gloop' and a brief star flash. The main background colour and that in each box can be chosen as can the number of pieces. The greater number of pieces, the smaller they are, naturally. I usually choose 800 which make them just about a good size and challenging enough for a standard laptop screen. When there's nothing interesting on Facebook, I load up the current puzzle and play a music video in the background and while away an hour or so in the afternoon. The mind boggles at the programming skills that makes something like this possible. Ideal for one person, but I notice you said 'we' so assume you're doing them with you wife so not so good. Thanks for sharing that one...I'll get onto the David Graeber ones next.

    Irv Mills said...

    @ Bev Courtney

    I hadn't realized there were jigsaw puzzle programs for computers. Neat. Quite a challenge on a laptop screen, no doubt.

    My wife and I are doing them together (mainly her, to be honest), so the computerized version wouldn't be too good.

    The Graeber ones are just what caught my eye first on YouTube, there are many others that might be as good or better. There is a book coming out this fall by David Graeber and David Wengrow that I am really eager to see.